Inauthentic Parade Sword
In the style of the southwestern Mongo (Mpamba / Dia / Bai / Kutu) of the D.R. Congo,
Forged iron, wood, brass tacks
Provenance dates back to 1993

Closely resembling the parade swords of the Ekonda, this blade type can be distinguished by its handle design, displaying a proud, decorated head. This sword type was originally used by a number of southwestern Mongo peoples living in the area of Lake Tumba and Lake Mai Ndombe. These swords were displayed in a variety of circumstances, but most notably in parades and for divination; many were the prerogative of women as well (Elsen, Beaute Fatale, 1992; Elsen, De fer et de fierté, 2003; Felix, Fatal Beauty: Traditional Weapons from Central Africa, 2009; Westerdijk, African Metal Implements, 1984).

There are a number of published examples to which we can compare this piece, notably those in Elsen (Communal), Beaute Fatale, 1992 (from the collection of the Royal Museum For Central Africa), Felix, Fatal Beauty, 2009, and Westerdijk, African Metal Implements, 1984. In comparing this handle with the published examples, we see a consistent aesthetic in the manner in which the sculptor articulated the facial features and the overall handle. Also, the blade on this piece is unquestionably genuine. So at first glance, this piece appears to conform to the correct aesthetic parameters for this obscure type, and also wears an antique, genuine blade.

Upon closely inspecting the intersection of the blade and handle, there are clear signs of applied adhesive, which should not be present for any reason.

Another problematic characteristic is the color and surface of the handle. The coloring on the surface is sporadic, and inconsistent with the wear that would result from handling. The handle is likely either an old piece that has been manipulated, or a newer piece with simulated age. Either way, the surface is problematic.

On the reverse of the knife, there is an inventory number written in white. At first glance, this appears to show the knife's presence in an important collection; possibly a museum. However, this too is problematic. This type of labeling is consistently done with care, intent, and precision. On this blade, the lettering is done with carelessness, so much so that the writer seems so have run out of room, and thus continued his/her thought on the next line. While in one scenario, this could prove to be an honest mistake, it seems more likely an attempt to deceive. If the handle is in fact a newer creation - as suggested by the strange patina and the presence of adhesive between the blade and handle - an unusual collection note written in white over both pieces would certainly suggest that the two pieces (blade and handle) were "born together." The fact that the origin of this collection information is unknown only supports the hypothesis that the white notation is an attempt to deceive.

21.5 in :: 55 cm

InventoryID #13-363

Not For Sale